Learn how Huly and Leantime differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Both Huly and Leantime have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Huly leads in popularity with 25,446 stars vs 9,539 stars for Leantime. The 167% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Huly has 1,845 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Huly last updated 7 hours ago and Leantime 2 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Huly uses Bash, Typescript, Python, SCSS while Leantime leverages CSS, PHP, Laravel.
Leantime has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Huly which began 5 years ago. This 6.6-year head start suggests Leantime may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Huly is licensed under EPL-2.0 while Leantime uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites. However, they also have distinct specializations: Huly also focuses on Collaborative Workspaces, Video Conferencing & Virtual Office while Leantime extends into Task Management.
Leantime provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Huly may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs