Learn how Leantime and Super Productivity differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these task management tools is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Both Leantime and Super Productivity have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Super Productivity leads in popularity with 18,816 stars vs 9,539 stars for Leantime. The 97% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Super Productivity has 1,632 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Leantime last updated 2 days ago and Super Productivity 2 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Leantime uses PHP, Laravel while Super Productivity leverages Bash, Typescript, JSX, SCSS, Objective-C, Java, Ruby, Swift, Kotlin, MATLAB.
Leantime has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Super Productivity which began 9 years ago. This 2.0-year head start suggests Leantime may have more mature features and established processes.
Super Productivity uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Leantime's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Task Management. However, they also have distinct specializations: Leantime also focuses on Project Management Suites while Super Productivity extends into Time Tracking, Project & Work Management.
Leantime provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Super Productivity may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.