Ad
 
Learn more

SolidTime vs Super Productivity

Learn how SolidTime and Super Productivity differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these time tracking tools is best for you.

vs
Favicon of SolidTime

SolidTime

Seamlessly track time across multiple projects, generate insightful reports, and optimize your open source contributions.
  • Stars


    8,598
  • Forks


    450
  • Last commit


    2 days ago
  • Repository age


    2 years
  • License


    AGPL-3.0
  • Self-hosted


    Yes
View Repository

Auto-fetched .

Screenshot of SolidTime
Favicon of Super Productivity

Super Productivity

Combines task management, time tracking, Pomodoro focus sessions, and GitHub/Jira integration in a local-first app for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and iOS.
  • Stars


    19,769
  • Forks


    1,726
  • Last commit


    21 hours ago
  • Repository age


    9 years
  • License


    MIT
View Repository

Auto-fetched .

Screenshot of Super Productivity

Detailed Comparison

Super Productivity appears to have several advantages over SolidTime, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Super Productivity wins
Community & Popularity

Super Productivity leads in popularity with 19,769 stars vs 8,598 stars for SolidTime. The 130% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Super Productivity has 1,726 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Comparable
Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with SolidTime last updated 2 days ago and Super Productivity 21 hours ago.

Comparable
Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: SolidTime uses Vue, PHP, Laravel while Super Productivity leverages JSX, SCSS, Objective-C, Java, Ruby, Swift, Kotlin, MATLAB.

Super Productivity wins
Project Maturity

Super Productivity has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to SolidTime which began 2 years ago. This 7.1-year head start suggests Super Productivity may have more mature features and established processes.

Super Productivity wins
Licensing

Super Productivity uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than SolidTime's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Time Tracking. However, they also have distinct specializations: Super Productivity extends into Task Management, Project & Work Management.

SolidTime wins
Hosting & Deployment

SolidTime provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Super Productivity may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.