What is the main difference between SolidTime and Super Productivity?

SolidTime and Super Productivity are both time tracking tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: SolidTime or Super Productivity?

The choice between SolidTime and Super Productivity depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from SolidTime to Super Productivity?

Migration between SolidTime and Super Productivity is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Openlane – Open-source, developer-first platform for automated compliance, risk management, and built-in Trust Center.

Learn more

SolidTime vs Super Productivity

Learn how SolidTime and Super Productivity differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these time tracking tools is best for you.

SolidTime

Seamlessly track time across multiple projects, generate insightful reports, and optimize your open source contributions.

Visit SolidTime Read more

9,116stars+132(+1.5%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
19 hours ago
Repository age
3 years
Version
v0.22.1
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
solidtime

Super Productivity

Privacy-first task manager combining task lists, Kanban, Pomodoro timers, time tracking, and integrations with GitHub, GitLab, and Jira. No account required, works offline.

Visit Super Productivity Read more

23,498stars+814(+3.6%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
19 hours ago
Repository age
10 years
Version
v20.0.0
License
MIT
Repository
super-productivity

Detailed Comparison

Super Productivity appears to have several advantages over SolidTime, particularly in popularity, growth, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Super Productivity wins

Community & Popularity

Super Productivity leads in popularity with 23,498 stars vs 9,116 stars for SolidTime. The 158% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Super Productivity has 2,262 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Super Productivity wins

Growth Momentum

Super Productivity is growing faster, adding 814 stars in the last 30 days (+3.6%) against adding 132 stars for SolidTime (+1.5%). Super Productivity is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with SolidTime last updated 19 hours ago and Super Productivity 19 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: SolidTime uses PHP, Vue, Laravel while Super Productivity leverages JSX, SCSS, Objective-C, Java, Swift, Ruby, Kotlin, MATLAB.

Super Productivity wins

Project Maturity

Super Productivity has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to SolidTime which began 3 years ago. This 7.1-year head start suggests Super Productivity may have more mature features and established processes.

Super Productivity wins

Licensing

Super Productivity uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than SolidTime's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Time Tracking. However, they also have distinct specializations: Super Productivity extends into Task Management.

SolidTime wins

Hosting & Deployment

SolidTime provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Super Productivity may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.