Learn how SolidTime and Super Productivity differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these time tracking tools is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Super Productivity appears to have several advantages over SolidTime, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Super Productivity leads in popularity with 19,199 stars vs 8,527 stars for SolidTime. The 125% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Super Productivity has 1,667 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with SolidTime last updated 7 days ago and Super Productivity 14 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: SolidTime uses PHP, Vue, Laravel while Super Productivity leverages JSX, SCSS, Objective-C, Java, Ruby, Swift, Kotlin, MATLAB.
Super Productivity has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to SolidTime which began 2 years ago. This 7.1-year head start suggests Super Productivity may have more mature features and established processes.
Super Productivity uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than SolidTime's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Time Tracking. However, they also have distinct specializations: Super Productivity extends into Task Management, Project & Work Management.
SolidTime provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Super Productivity may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.