Learn how SolidTime and Super Productivity differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these time tracking tools is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Super Productivity appears to have several advantages over SolidTime, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Super Productivity leads in popularity with 18,765 stars vs 8,461 stars for SolidTime. The 122% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Super Productivity has 1,623 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with SolidTime last updated 1 day ago and Super Productivity 18 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: SolidTime uses PHP, Vue, Laravel while Super Productivity leverages JSX, SCSS, Objective-C, Java, Ruby, Swift, Kotlin, MATLAB.
Super Productivity has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to SolidTime which began 2 years ago. This 7.1-year head start suggests Super Productivity may have more mature features and established processes.
Super Productivity uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than SolidTime's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Time Tracking. However, they also have distinct specializations: SolidTime also focuses on Developer Tools while Super Productivity extends into Task Management, Project & Work Management.
SolidTime provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Super Productivity may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.