What is the main difference between Planka and Super Productivity?

Planka and Super Productivity are both task management tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Planka or Super Productivity?

The choice between Planka and Super Productivity depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Planka to Super Productivity?

Migration between Planka and Super Productivity is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Stellar Hosted – Managed Open Source software hosting in the EU: secure, compliant, fast.

Start using Open Source today

Learn more

Planka vs Super Productivity

Learn how Planka and Super Productivity differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these task management tools is best for you.

Planka

Self-hosted Kanban board for agile teams. Unlimited boards, real-time sync, GDPR-compliant, and available as a free Community Edition or paid Pro.

Visit Planka Read more

Stars
12,024
Forks
1,260
Last commit
4 days ago
Repository age
7 years
Self-hosted
Yes

View Repository

Auto-fetched 4 minutes ago.

Super Productivity

Combines task management, time tracking, Pomodoro focus sessions, and GitHub/Jira integration in a local-first app for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and iOS.

Visit Super Productivity Read more

Stars
19,682
Forks
1,715
Last commit
3 hours ago
Repository age
9 years
License
MIT

View Repository

Auto-fetched 4 minutes ago.

Detailed Comparison

Super Productivity appears to have several advantages over Planka, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Super Productivity wins

Community & Popularity

Super Productivity leads in popularity with 19,682 stars vs 12,024 stars for Planka. The 64% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Super Productivity has 1,715 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Planka last updated 4 days ago and Super Productivity 3 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, JSX, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Planka uses Python while Super Productivity leverages Typescript, Objective-C, Java, Ruby, Swift, Kotlin, MATLAB.

Super Productivity wins

Project Maturity

Super Productivity has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to Planka which began 7 years ago. This 2.7-year head start suggests Super Productivity may have more mature features and established processes.

Super Productivity wins

Licensing

Super Productivity is licensed under MIT, while Planka's license terms are not publicly specified.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Task Management. However, they also have distinct specializations: Planka also focuses on Project Management Suites, Agile Project Management while Super Productivity extends into Time Tracking, Project & Work Management.

Planka wins

Hosting & Deployment

Planka provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Super Productivity may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.