What is the main difference between Super Productivity and TimeTracker?

Super Productivity and TimeTracker are both time tracking tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Super Productivity or TimeTracker?

The choice between Super Productivity and TimeTracker depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Super Productivity to TimeTracker?

Migration between Super Productivity and TimeTracker is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Stellar Hosted – Managed Open Source software hosting in the EU: secure, compliant, fast.

Learn more

Super Productivity vs TimeTracker

Learn how Super Productivity and TimeTracker differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these time tracking tools is best for you.

Super Productivity

Privacy-first task manager combining task lists, Kanban, Pomodoro timers, time tracking, and integrations with GitHub, GitLab, and Jira. No account required, works offline.

Visit Super Productivity Read more

23,690stars+812(+3.5%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
2 days ago
Repository age
10 years
Version
v20.0.0
License
MIT
Repository
super-productivity

TimeTracker

Free open-source time tracking software with 120+ features. Track time, manage projects, generate invoices. Complete data control with Docker deployment.

Visit TimeTracker Read more

644stars+11(+1.7%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
7 hours ago
Repository age
1 year
Version
v5.20.0
License
GPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
drytrix/timetracker

Detailed Comparison

Super Productivity appears to have several advantages over TimeTracker, particularly in popularity, growth, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Super Productivity wins

Community & Popularity

Super Productivity significantly outpaces TimeTracker in community adoption with 23,690 stars compared to 644 stars on GitHub. This 36.8x difference suggests Super Productivity has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Super Productivity has 2,343 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Super Productivity wins

Growth Momentum

Super Productivity is growing faster, adding 812 stars in the last 30 days (+3.5%) against adding 11 stars for TimeTracker (+1.7%). Super Productivity is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Super Productivity last updated 2 days ago and TimeTracker 7 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, JSX, Objective-C, Java, Kotlin, MATLAB. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Super Productivity uses Typescript, SCSS, Swift, Ruby while TimeTracker leverages Python, C, Dart.

Super Productivity wins

Project Maturity

Super Productivity has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to TimeTracker which began 1 year ago. This 8.7-year head start suggests Super Productivity may have more mature features and established processes.

Super Productivity wins

Licensing

Super Productivity uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than TimeTracker's GPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Time Tracking. However, they also have distinct specializations: Super Productivity also focuses on Task Management.

TimeTracker wins

Hosting & Deployment

TimeTracker provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Super Productivity may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.