Learn how Super Productivity and TimeTracker differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these time tracking tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
16 hours agoRepository age
10 yearsVersion
v19.3.1License
MITRepository
super-productivity
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
1 yearVersion
v5.18.3License
GPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
drytrix/timetracker
Super Productivity appears to have several advantages over TimeTracker, particularly in popularity, growth, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Super Productivity significantly outpaces TimeTracker in community adoption with 23,155 stars compared to 634 stars on GitHub. This 36.5x difference suggests Super Productivity has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Super Productivity has 2,201 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Super Productivity is growing faster, adding 872 stars in the last 30 days (+3.9%) against adding 6 stars for TimeTracker (+1%). Super Productivity is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Super Productivity last updated 16 hours ago and TimeTracker 1 day ago.
Super Productivity has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to TimeTracker which began 1 year ago. This 8.7-year head start suggests Super Productivity may have more mature features and established processes.
Super Productivity uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than TimeTracker's GPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Time Tracking. However, they also have distinct specializations: Super Productivity also focuses on Task Management.
TimeTracker provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Super Productivity may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs