Learn how Planka and Redmine differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Planka and Redmine have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Planka leads in popularity with 12,454 stars vs 6,020 stars for Redmine. The 107% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Redmine has 2,465 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Planka is growing faster, adding 175 stars in the last 30 days (+1.4%) against adding 4 stars for Redmine (+0.1%). Planka is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Planka last updated 16 days ago and Redmine 22 hours ago.
Redmine has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Planka which began 7 years ago. This 6.9-year head start suggests Redmine may have more mature features and established processes.
Redmine is licensed under GPL-2.0, while Planka's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites. However, they also have distinct specializations: Planka also focuses on Task Management, Agile Project Management.
Both Planka and Redmine offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs