Learn how Ever Teams and Redmine differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Redmine appears to have several advantages over Ever Teams, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Redmine significantly outpaces Ever Teams in community adoption with 6,020 stars compared to 545 stars on GitHub. This 11.0x difference suggests Redmine has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Redmine has 2,465 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Ever Teams is growing faster, adding 26 stars in the last 30 days (+5%) against adding 4 stars for Redmine (+0.1%). Ever Teams is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Ever Teams last updated 10 hours ago and Redmine 22 hours ago.
Redmine has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Ever Teams which began 4 years ago. This 10.0-year head start suggests Redmine may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Ever Teams is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while Redmine uses GPL-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites. However, they also have distinct specializations: Ever Teams also focuses on Collaborative Workspaces, Time Tracking.
Redmine provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Ever Teams may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs