Learn how Ever Teams and Kimai differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these time tracking tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Kimai appears to have several advantages over Ever Teams, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Kimai significantly outpaces Ever Teams in community adoption with 4,626 stars compared to 500 stars on GitHub. This 9.3x difference suggests Kimai has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Kimai has 771 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Ever Teams last updated 8 days ago and Kimai 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Ever Teams uses Typescript, JSX, Next.js while Kimai leverages SCSS, PHP.
Kimai has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Ever Teams which began 4 years ago. This 6.1-year head start suggests Kimai may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Time Tracking. However, they also have distinct specializations: Ever Teams also focuses on Project Management Suites, Collaborative Workspaces while Kimai extends into Freelancer Tools.
Kimai provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Ever Teams may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs