Learn how Kimai and Midday differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these freelancer tools is best for you.

Kimai appears to have several advantages over Midday, particularly in activity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Midday significantly outpaces Kimai in community adoption with 14,713 stars compared to 4,849 stars on GitHub. This 3.0x difference suggests Midday has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Midday has 1,784 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Kimai shows more recent development activity with its last commit 18 hours ago, while Midday was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests Kimai is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Kimai uses Bash, SCSS, PHP while Midday leverages Typescript, JSX, Next.js, Rust, Tauri.
Kimai has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Midday which began 3 years ago. This 7.0-year head start suggests Kimai may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Freelancer Tools. However, they also have distinct specializations: Kimai also focuses on Time Tracking while Midday extends into Accounting Software, Invoicing & Payments.
Kimai provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Midday may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.

vs
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository