Learn how Kimai and Midday differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these freelancer tools is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Both Kimai and Midday have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Midday significantly outpaces Kimai in community adoption with 14,206 stars compared to 4,626 stars on GitHub. This 3.1x difference suggests Midday has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Midday has 1,393 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Kimai last updated 1 day ago and Midday 23 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Kimai uses Bash, SCSS, PHP while Midday leverages Typescript, JSX, Next.js, Rust, Tauri.
Kimai has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Midday which began 3 years ago. This 7.0-year head start suggests Kimai may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Freelancer Tools. However, they also have distinct specializations: Kimai also focuses on Time Tracking while Midday extends into Invoicing & Payments, Accounting Software.
Kimai provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Midday may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.