Learn how Kimai and Wakapi differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these time tracking tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Kimai and Wakapi have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Kimai having 4,919 stars and Wakapi having 4,405 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Kimai has 828 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Kimai is growing faster, adding 91 stars in the last 30 days (+1.9%) against adding 33 stars for Wakapi (+0.8%). Kimai is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Kimai last updated 7 hours ago and Wakapi 20 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Kimai uses CSS, SCSS, PHP while Wakapi leverages Python, Golang.
Kimai has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Wakapi which began 7 years ago. This 2.6-year head start suggests Kimai may have more mature features and established processes.
Wakapi uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Kimai's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Time Tracking. However, they also have distinct specializations: Kimai also focuses on Freelancer Tools.
Both Kimai and Wakapi offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.