Learn how Kimai and Wakapi differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these time tracking tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
10 yearsVersion
2.71.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
kimai/kimai
Last 30 days
Last commit
2 days agoRepository age
7 yearsVersion
2.18.2License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
muety/wakapi
Both Kimai and Wakapi have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Kimai having 5,143 stars and Wakapi having 4,473 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Kimai has 882 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Kimai is growing faster, adding 78 stars in the last 30 days (+1.5%) against adding 26 stars for Wakapi (+0.6%). Kimai is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Kimai last updated 2 days ago and Wakapi 2 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Kimai uses CSS, SCSS, PHP while Wakapi leverages Python, Golang.
Kimai has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Wakapi which began 7 years ago. This 2.6-year head start suggests Kimai may have more mature features and established processes.
Wakapi uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Kimai's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Time Tracking. However, they also have distinct specializations: Kimai also focuses on Freelancer Tools.
Both Kimai and Wakapi offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.