Learn how Ever Teams and Kan differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days

Kan appears to have several advantages over Ever Teams, particularly in popularity, growth and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Kan significantly outpaces Ever Teams in community adoption with 5,623 stars compared to 546 stars on GitHub. This 10.3x difference suggests Kan has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Kan has 468 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Kan is growing faster, adding 283 stars in the last 30 days (+5.3%) against adding 3 stars for Ever Teams (+0.6%). Kan is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Ever Teams last updated 1 day ago and Kan 2 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js.
Ever Teams has been in development longer, starting 4 years ago, compared to Kan which began 3 years ago. This 1.1-year head start suggests Ever Teams may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites. However, they also have distinct specializations: Ever Teams also focuses on Collaborative Workspaces, Time Tracking while Kan extends into Task Management.
Kan provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Ever Teams may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs