Ad
 
Learn More

Kan vs Kaneo

Learn how Kan and Kaneo differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these task management tools is best for you.

vs
Favicon of Kan

Kan

Free kanban project management with unlimited boards, lists, and cards. Import Trello boards, collaborate with teams, and self-host for complete control.
5,469stars+225(+4.3%)

Last 30 days

Sponsor Kan ongithub.com
Screenshot of Kan
Favicon of Kaneo

Kaneo

Self-hosted project management platform with visual task management, data privacy, and complete control over customization - built by developers for developers.
8,489stars+4,594(+118%)

Last 30 days

  • Last commit


    15 hours ago
  • Repository age


    2 years
  • Version


    v2.22.0
  • License


    MIT
  • Self-hosted


    Yes
  • Repository


    usekaneo/kaneo
Sponsor Kaneo ongithub.com
Screenshot of Kaneo

Detailed Comparison

Kaneo appears to have several advantages over Kan, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Kaneo wins
Community & Popularity

Kaneo leads in popularity with 8,489 stars vs 5,469 stars for Kan. The 55% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Kaneo has 703 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Kaneo wins
Growth Momentum

Kaneo is growing faster, adding 4,594 stars in the last 30 days (+118%) against adding 225 stars for Kan (+4.3%). Kaneo is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable
Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Kan last updated 1 day ago and Kaneo 15 hours ago.

Comparable
Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js.

Kan wins
Project Maturity

Kan has been in development longer, starting 3 years ago, compared to Kaneo which began 2 years ago. This 1.2-year head start suggests Kan may have more mature features and established processes.

Kaneo wins
Licensing

Kaneo uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Kan's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Task Management. However, they also have distinct specializations: Kan also focuses on Project Management Suites.

Comparable
Hosting & Deployment

Both Kan and Kaneo offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.