What is the main difference between Kan and Macro Tasks?

Kan and Macro Tasks are both task management tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Kan or Macro Tasks?

The choice between Kan and Macro Tasks depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Kan to Macro Tasks?

Migration between Kan and Macro Tasks is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

c15t – Open-source cookie banner, built for control and lightening fast modern web apps.

Learn more

Kan vs Macro Tasks

Learn how Kan and Macro Tasks differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these task management tools is best for you.

Kan

Free kanban project management with unlimited boards, lists, and cards. Import Trello boards, collaborate with teams, and self-host for complete control.

Visit Kan Read more

5,877stars+147(+2.6%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
11 hours ago
Repository age
3 years
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
kanbn/kan

Macro Tasks

Task manager built for engineering teams, combining status tracking, priority management, GitHub integration, and AI agents that can close tasks automatically.

Visit Macro Tasks Read more

6,142stars+1,583(+35%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
7 hours ago
Repository age
1 year
Version
v2026.11.3.1
License
AGPL-3.0
Repository
macro-inc/macro

Detailed Comparison

Both Kan and Macro Tasks have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Comparable

Community & Popularity

Both Kan and Macro Tasks show comparable community engagement with 5,877 and 6,142 stars respectively. In terms of developer contributions, Macro Tasks has 571 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Macro Tasks wins

Growth Momentum

Macro Tasks is growing faster, adding 1,583 stars in the last 30 days (+35%) against adding 147 stars for Kan (+2.6%). Macro Tasks is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Kan last updated 11 hours ago and Macro Tasks 7 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Kan uses Next.js while Macro Tasks leverages Python, Rust, C, Objective-C, Swift, Kotlin, Tauri.

Kan wins

Project Maturity

Kan has been in development longer, starting 3 years ago, compared to Macro Tasks which began 1 year ago. This 2.1-year head start suggests Kan may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Task Management. However, they also have distinct specializations: Kan also focuses on Project Management Suites.

Kan wins

Hosting & Deployment

Kan provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Macro Tasks may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.