Learn how Kan and Leantime differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.
Last 30 days

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Kan and Leantime have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Leantime leads in popularity with 11,427 stars vs 5,473 stars for Kan. The 109% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Leantime has 1,112 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Kan is growing faster, adding 225 stars in the last 30 days (+4.3%) against adding 360 stars for Leantime (+3.3%). Kan is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Kan last updated 2 days ago and Leantime 9 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Kan uses Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js while Leantime leverages PHP, Laravel.
Leantime has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Kan which began 3 years ago. This 8.9-year head start suggests Leantime may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites, Task Management.
Both Kan and Leantime offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs