Ad
 
Learn more

Kan vs Leantime

Learn how Kan and Leantime differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.

vs
Favicon of Kan

Kan

Free kanban project management with unlimited boards, lists, and cards. Import Trello boards, collaborate with teams, and self-host for complete control.
  • Stars


    4,662
  • Forks


    327
  • Last commit


    4 days ago
  • Repository age


    2 years
  • License


    AGPL-3.0
  • Self-hosted


    Yes
View Repository

Auto-fetched .

Screenshot of Kan
Favicon of Leantime

Leantime

Open-source software designed to streamline tasks, boost productivity, and enhance collaboration for teams of all types, including those with ADHD and neurodiversity.
  • Stars


    9,539
  • Forks


    934
  • Last commit


    2 days ago
  • Repository age


    11 years
  • License


    AGPL-3.0
  • Self-hosted


    Yes
View Repository

Auto-fetched .

Screenshot of Leantime

Detailed Comparison

Leantime appears to have several advantages over Kan, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Leantime wins
Community & Popularity

Leantime leads in popularity with 9,539 stars vs 4,662 stars for Kan. The 105% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Leantime has 934 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Comparable
Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Kan last updated 4 days ago and Leantime 2 days ago.

Comparable
Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Kan uses Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js while Leantime leverages PHP, Laravel.

Leantime wins
Project Maturity

Leantime has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Kan which began 2 years ago. This 8.9-year head start suggests Leantime may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable
Licensing

Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites, Task Management.

Comparable
Hosting & Deployment

Both Kan and Leantime offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.