Logto – Modern auth infrastructure for developers. Add multi-tenancy, enterprise SSO, and RBAC to your SaaS or AI apps.Learn how Kan and Leantime differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.
Leantime appears to have several advantages over Kan, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Leantime leads in popularity with 11,200 stars vs 5,296 stars for Kan. The 111% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Leantime has 1,091 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Kan last updated 18 hours ago and Leantime 3 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Kan uses Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js while Leantime leverages PHP, Laravel.
Leantime has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Kan which began 3 years ago. This 8.9-year head start suggests Leantime may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites, Task Management.
Both Kan and Leantime offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
Kanvs
HulyActivity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository
License
Self-hosted
Repository
