Learn how Leantime and Worklenz differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Leantime appears to have several advantages over Worklenz, particularly in popularity, activity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Leantime significantly outpaces Worklenz in community adoption with 9,539 stars compared to 3,022 stars on GitHub. This 3.2x difference suggests Leantime has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Leantime has 934 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Leantime shows more recent development activity with its last commit 2 days ago, while Worklenz was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests Leantime is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Leantime uses PHP, Laravel while Worklenz leverages Bash, Typescript, JSX, SCSS.
Leantime has been in development longer, starting 11 years ago, compared to Worklenz which began 2 years ago. This 9.4-year head start suggests Leantime may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites, Task Management.
Leantime provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Worklenz may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs