Learn how Leantime and Worklenz differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Leantime appears to have several advantages over Worklenz, particularly in popularity, growth, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Leantime significantly outpaces Worklenz in community adoption with 11,424 stars compared to 3,150 stars on GitHub. This 3.6x difference suggests Leantime has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Leantime has 1,111 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Leantime is growing faster, adding 374 stars in the last 30 days (+3.4%) against adding 36 stars for Worklenz (+1.2%). Leantime is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Leantime last updated 9 days ago and Worklenz 13 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Leantime uses PHP, Laravel while Worklenz leverages Bash, Typescript, JSX, SCSS.
Leantime has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Worklenz which began 2 years ago. This 9.4-year head start suggests Leantime may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites, Task Management.
Leantime provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Worklenz may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs