Learn how Leantime and Worklenz differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
11 hours agoRepository age
12 yearsVersion
v3.12.0License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
leantime/leantime
Last 30 days
Last commit
9 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v3.3.1License
AGPL-3.0Repository
worklenz/worklenz
Leantime appears to have several advantages over Worklenz, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Leantime significantly outpaces Worklenz in community adoption with 11,913 stars compared to 3,275 stars on GitHub. This 3.6x difference suggests Leantime has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Leantime has 1,163 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Worklenz is growing faster, adding 84 stars in the last 30 days (+2.6%) against adding 245 stars for Leantime (+2.1%). Worklenz is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Leantime last updated 11 hours ago and Worklenz 9 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Leantime uses PHP, Laravel while Worklenz leverages Bash, Typescript, JSX, SCSS.
Leantime has been in development longer, starting 12 years ago, compared to Worklenz which began 2 years ago. This 9.4-year head start suggests Leantime may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites, Task Management.
Leantime provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Worklenz may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs