Learn how Redmine and Worklenz differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Redmine appears to have several advantages over Worklenz, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Redmine leads in popularity with 6,020 stars vs 3,150 stars for Worklenz. The 91% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Redmine has 2,465 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Worklenz is growing faster, adding 32 stars in the last 30 days (+1%) against adding 4 stars for Redmine (+0.1%). Worklenz is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Redmine last updated 22 hours ago and Worklenz 3 days ago.
Redmine has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Worklenz which began 2 years ago. This 11.7-year head start suggests Redmine may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Redmine is licensed under GPL-2.0 while Worklenz uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites. However, they also have distinct specializations: Worklenz extends into Task Management.
Redmine provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Worklenz may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs