Learn how Redmine and Windshift differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Redmine and Windshift have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Redmine significantly outpaces Windshift in community adoption with 6,043 stars compared to 324 stars on GitHub. This 18.7x difference suggests Redmine has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Redmine has 2,474 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Windshift is growing faster, adding 183 stars in the last 30 days (+130%) against adding 12 stars for Redmine (+0.2%). Windshift is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Redmine last updated 13 hours ago and Windshift 6 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Redmine uses Ruby, Perl while Windshift leverages Bash, Typescript, JSX, Golang, Tauri.
Redmine has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Windshift which began 10 months ago. This 13.3-year head start suggests Redmine may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Redmine is licensed under GPL-2.0 while Windshift uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites.
Both Redmine and Windshift offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs