Learn how Windshift and Worklenz differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
12 hours agoRepository age
11 monthsVersion
v0.9.3License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
windshiftapp/core
Last 30 days
Last commit
8 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v3.3.1License
AGPL-3.0Repository
worklenz/worklenz
Both Windshift and Worklenz have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Worklenz significantly outpaces Windshift in community adoption with 3,295 stars compared to 402 stars on GitHub. This 8.2x difference suggests Worklenz has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Worklenz has 395 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Windshift is growing faster, adding 83 stars in the last 30 days (+26%) against adding 101 stars for Worklenz (+3.2%). Windshift is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Windshift last updated 12 hours ago and Worklenz 8 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Windshift uses Python, Golang, Tauri while Worklenz leverages SCSS.
Worklenz has been in development longer, starting 2 years ago, compared to Windshift which began 11 months ago. This 1.6-year head start suggests Worklenz may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites. However, they also have distinct specializations: Worklenz extends into Task Management.
Windshift provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Worklenz may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs