Learn how Kan and OpenProject differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.
Last 30 days

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Kan and OpenProject have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenProject leads in popularity with 15,915 stars vs 5,473 stars for Kan. The 191% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, OpenProject has 3,440 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Kan is growing faster, adding 225 stars in the last 30 days (+4.3%) against adding 250 stars for OpenProject (+1.6%). Kan is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Kan last updated 2 days ago and OpenProject 6 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Kan uses Next.js while OpenProject leverages SCSS, Ruby, Perl.
OpenProject has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Kan which began 3 years ago. This 11.1-year head start suggests OpenProject may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Kan is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while OpenProject uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites. However, they also have distinct specializations: Kan also focuses on Task Management while OpenProject extends into Agile Project Management.
Both Kan and OpenProject offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs