Ad
 
Learn more

Kan vs OpenProject

Learn how Kan and OpenProject differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.

vs
Favicon of Kan

Kan

Free kanban project management with unlimited boards, lists, and cards. Import Trello boards, collaborate with teams, and self-host for complete control.
  • Stars


    5,055
  • Forks


    393
  • Last commit


    13 days ago
  • Repository age


    3 years
  • License


    AGPL-3.0
  • Self-hosted


    Yes
View Repository
Screenshot of Kan
Favicon of OpenProject

OpenProject

Full-featured project management platform with Gantt charts, agile boards, time tracking, and team collaboration. Self-host or use managed cloud hosting.
  • Stars


    15,391
  • Forks


    3,327
  • Last commit


    11 hours ago
  • Repository age


    14 years
  • License


    GPL-3.0
  • Self-hosted


    Yes
View Repository
Screenshot of OpenProject

Detailed Comparison

OpenProject appears to have several advantages over Kan, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

OpenProject wins
Community & Popularity

OpenProject significantly outpaces Kan in community adoption with 15,391 stars compared to 5,055 stars on GitHub. This 3.0x difference suggests OpenProject has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OpenProject has 3,327 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Comparable
Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Kan last updated 13 days ago and OpenProject 11 hours ago.

Comparable
Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Kan uses Next.js while OpenProject leverages SCSS, Ruby, Perl.

OpenProject wins
Project Maturity

OpenProject has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Kan which began 3 years ago. This 11.1-year head start suggests OpenProject may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable
Licensing

The projects use different licenses: Kan is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while OpenProject uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.

Comparable
Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites. However, they also have distinct specializations: Kan also focuses on Task Management while OpenProject extends into Agile Project Management.

Comparable
Hosting & Deployment

Both Kan and OpenProject offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.