Learn how Kan and OpenProject differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

OpenProject appears to have several advantages over Kan, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenProject significantly outpaces Kan in community adoption with 14,907 stars compared to 4,662 stars on GitHub. This 3.2x difference suggests OpenProject has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OpenProject has 3,207 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Kan last updated 4 days ago and OpenProject 18 minutes ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Kan uses Next.js while OpenProject leverages SCSS, Ruby, Perl.
OpenProject has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Kan which began 2 years ago. This 11.1-year head start suggests OpenProject may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Kan is licensed under AGPL-3.0 while OpenProject uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites. However, they also have distinct specializations: Kan also focuses on Task Management while OpenProject extends into Agile Project Management.
Both Kan and OpenProject offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs