Learn how OpenProject and Operately differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

OpenProject appears to have several advantages over Operately, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
OpenProject significantly outpaces Operately in community adoption with 14,907 stars compared to 446 stars on GitHub. This 33.4x difference suggests OpenProject has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OpenProject has 3,207 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with OpenProject last updated 8 hours ago and Operately 9 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Ruby. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OpenProject uses SCSS, Perl while Operately leverages Python, Elixir.
OpenProject has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Operately which began 3 years ago. This 10.4-year head start suggests OpenProject may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: OpenProject is licensed under GPL-3.0 while Operately uses Apache-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites. However, they also have distinct specializations: OpenProject also focuses on Agile Project Management.
Both OpenProject and Operately offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs