Learn how Ever Teams and Plane differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
15 hours agoRepository age
4 yearsVersion
v0.152.12License
AGPL-3.0Repository
ever-co/ever-teams
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
4 yearsVersion
v1.4.3License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
makeplane/plane
Plane appears to have several advantages over Ever Teams, particularly in popularity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Plane significantly outpaces Ever Teams in community adoption with 62,140 stars compared to 605 stars on GitHub. This 102.7x difference suggests Plane has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Plane has 6,338 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Ever Teams and Plane are moving at much the same rate, adding 16 stars and adding 1,542 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+2.7% vs +2.5%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Ever Teams last updated 15 hours ago and Plane 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Plane leverages Python.
Both projects started around the same time, with Ever Teams beginning 4 years ago and Plane 4 years ago.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites, Collaborative Workspaces. However, they also have distinct specializations: Ever Teams also focuses on Time Tracking while Plane extends into Agile Project Management.
Plane provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Ever Teams may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs