Fizzy vs Super Productivity
Learn how Fizzy and Super Productivity differ in their key features, development activity, technology
stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project & work management tools is best for you.
Learn how Fizzy and Super Productivity differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project & work management tools is best for you.
Fizzy
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 hour agoRepository age
2 yearsSelf-hosted
YesRepository
basecamp/fizzy
Super Productivity
Last 30 days
Last commit
13 hours agoRepository age
10 yearsVersion
v18.19.0License
MITRepository
johannesjo/super-productivity
Detailed Comparison
Super Productivity appears to have several advantages over Fizzy, particularly in popularity, growth, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Super Productivity appears to have several advantages over Fizzy, particularly in popularity, growth, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Community & Popularity
Super Productivity leads in popularity with 21,532 stars vs 8,116 stars for Fizzy. The 165% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Super Productivity has 1,975 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Growth Momentum
Super Productivity is growing faster, adding 681 stars in the last 30 days (+3.3%) against adding 141 stars for Fizzy (+1.8%). Super Productivity is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Development Activity
Both projects show recent activity, with Fizzy last updated 1 hour ago and Super Productivity 13 hours ago.
Technology Stack
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Ruby. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Super Productivity leverages Typescript, JSX, SCSS, Objective-C, Java, Swift, Kotlin, MATLAB.
Project Maturity
Super Productivity has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Fizzy which began 2 years ago. This 7.6-year head start suggests Super Productivity may have more mature features and established processes.
Licensing
Super Productivity is licensed under MIT, while Fizzy's license terms are not publicly specified.
Use Cases & Features
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project & Work Management. However, they also have distinct specializations: Fizzy also focuses on Agile Project Management while Super Productivity extends into Task Management, Time Tracking.
Hosting & Deployment
Fizzy provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Super Productivity may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
Sent – A unified API for sending messages across SMS, RCS, and apps like WhatsApp.