Learn how Freeter and Super Productivity differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project & work management tools is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Activity score

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Activity score

Super Productivity appears to have several advantages over Freeter, particularly in popularity, activity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Super Productivity significantly outpaces Freeter in community adoption with 20,549 stars compared to 1,011 stars on GitHub. This 20.3x difference suggests Super Productivity has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Super Productivity has 1,843 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Super Productivity shows more recent development activity with its last commit 17 hours ago, while Freeter was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests Super Productivity is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Typescript, JSX, SCSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Super Productivity leverages CSS, Bash, Objective-C, Java, Ruby, Swift, Kotlin, MATLAB.
Super Productivity has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Freeter which began 3 years ago. This 7.1-year head start suggests Super Productivity may have more mature features and established processes.
Super Productivity uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Freeter's GPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project & Work Management. However, they also have distinct specializations: Freeter also focuses on Workspace Organizers while Super Productivity extends into Task Management, Time Tracking.