Learn how Huly and Taiga differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Huly appears to have several advantages over Taiga, particularly in popularity and growth. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Huly significantly outpaces Taiga in community adoption with 27,429 stars compared to 847 stars on GitHub. This 32.4x difference suggests Huly has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Huly has 2,111 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Huly is growing faster, adding 401 stars in the last 30 days (+1.5%) against adding 4 stars for Taiga (+0.5%). Huly is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Huly last updated 13 days ago and Taiga 20 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Huly uses JavaScript, Typescript, SCSS while Taiga leverages CSS, Django.
Both projects started around the same time, with Huly beginning 5 years ago and Taiga 5 years ago.
The projects use different licenses: Huly is licensed under EPL-2.0 while Taiga uses MPL-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites. However, they also have distinct specializations: Huly also focuses on Collaborative Workspaces, Video Conferencing & Virtual Office while Taiga extends into Agile Project Management.
Both Huly and Taiga offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.