Learn how Huly and Taiga differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Both Huly and Taiga have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Huly significantly outpaces Taiga in community adoption with 25,446 stars compared to 823 stars on GitHub. This 30.9x difference suggests Huly has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Huly has 1,845 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Huly last updated 7 hours ago and Taiga 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with Bash, Python. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Huly uses JavaScript, Typescript, SCSS while Taiga leverages CSS, Django.
Both projects started around the same time, with Huly beginning 5 years ago and Taiga 5 years ago.
The projects use different licenses: Huly is licensed under EPL-2.0 while Taiga uses MPL-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites. However, they also have distinct specializations: Huly also focuses on Collaborative Workspaces, Video Conferencing & Virtual Office while Taiga extends into Agile Project Management.
Taiga provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Huly may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs