Learn how Sayr and Wekan differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Wekan appears to have several advantages over Sayr, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Wekan significantly outpaces Sayr in community adoption with 21,093 stars compared to 27 stars on GitHub. This 781.2x difference suggests Wekan has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Wekan has 3,000 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Sayr last updated 3 days ago and Wekan 44 minutes ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Sayr uses Typescript, JSX, Tanstack Start while Wekan leverages Python, SCSS, PHP, Perl, Meteor.
Wekan has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Sayr which began 1 year ago. This 11.7-year head start suggests Wekan may have more mature features and established processes.
Wekan is licensed under MIT, while Sayr's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites. However, they also have distinct specializations: Sayr also focuses on Feedback & Feature Request Management.
Both Sayr and Wekan offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs