Learn how Kanba and Wekan differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project & work management tools is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Wekan appears to have several advantages over Kanba, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Wekan significantly outpaces Kanba in community adoption with 21,073 stars compared to 652 stars on GitHub. This 32.3x difference suggests Wekan has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Wekan has 3,002 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Kanba is growing faster, adding 15 stars in the last 30 days (+2.4%) against adding 54 stars for Wekan (+0.3%). Kanba is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Kanba last updated 29 days ago and Wekan 2 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Kanba uses Typescript, JSX, Next.js while Wekan leverages Bash, Python, SCSS, PHP, Perl, Meteor.
Wekan has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Kanba which began 1 year ago. This 11.6-year head start suggests Wekan may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project & Work Management.
Wekan provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Kanba may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.