Learn how Kanba and Wekan differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these project management suites is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
3 months agoRepository age
1 yearVersion
1.0.8License
MITRepository
uaghazade1/kanba
Last 30 days
Last commit
11 hours agoRepository age
13 yearsVersion
v12.96License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
wekan/wekan
Wekan appears to have several advantages over Kanba, particularly in popularity, activity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Wekan significantly outpaces Kanba in community adoption with 21,154 stars compared to 661 stars on GitHub. This 32.0x difference suggests Wekan has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Wekan has 3,003 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Kanba is growing faster, adding 3 stars in the last 30 days (+0.5%) against adding 43 stars for Wekan (+0.2%). Kanba is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Wekan shows more recent development activity with its last commit 11 hours ago, while Kanba was last updated 3 months ago. This suggests Wekan is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Kanba uses Typescript, JSX, Next.js while Wekan leverages Bash, Python, SCSS, PHP, Perl, Meteor.
Wekan has been in development longer, starting 13 years ago, compared to Kanba which began 1 year ago. This 11.6-year head start suggests Wekan may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Project Management Suites.
Wekan provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Kanba may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs