What is the main difference between Hackatime and TimeScribe?

Hackatime and TimeScribe are both time tracking tools but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Hackatime or TimeScribe?

The choice between Hackatime and TimeScribe depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Hackatime to TimeScribe?

Migration between Hackatime and TimeScribe is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

c15t – Open-source cookie banner, built for control and lightening fast modern web apps.

Learn More

Hackatime vs TimeScribe

Learn how Hackatime and TimeScribe differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these time tracking tools is best for you.

Hackatime

Free, open-source coding time tracker compatible with VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, vim, emacs and more. No limits, no paywalls - your data stays yours forever.

Visit Hackatime Read more

215stars+10(+4.9%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
7 hours ago
Repository age
2 years
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
hackclub/hackatime

TimeScribe

Advanced time tracking and productivity analytics tool that captures detailed work patterns, generates comprehensive reports, and helps optimize workflow efficiency.

Visit TimeScribe Read more

917stars+13(+1.4%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
28 days ago
Repository age
2 years
Version
v1.17.1
License
GPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
winbigfox/timescribe

Detailed Comparison

Both Hackatime and TimeScribe have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

TimeScribe wins

Community & Popularity

TimeScribe significantly outpaces Hackatime in community adoption with 917 stars compared to 215 stars on GitHub. This 4.3x difference suggests TimeScribe has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Hackatime has 177 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Hackatime wins

Growth Momentum

Hackatime is growing faster, adding 10 stars in the last 30 days (+4.9%) against adding 13 stars for TimeScribe (+1.4%). Hackatime is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Hackatime last updated 7 hours ago and TimeScribe 28 days ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Hackatime uses Bash, Ruby while TimeScribe leverages PHP, Vue, Laravel.

Comparable

Project Maturity

Both projects started around the same time, with Hackatime beginning 2 years ago and TimeScribe 2 years ago.

Hackatime wins

Licensing

Hackatime uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than TimeScribe's GPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable