Learn how Plausible and Umami differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Plausible and Umami have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Plausible having 28,727 stars and Umami having 38,337 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Umami has 7,836 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Plausible is growing faster, adding 726 stars in the last 30 days (+2.6%) against adding 454 stars for Umami (+1.2%). Plausible is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Plausible last updated 5 hours ago and Umami 4 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Plausible uses Bash, PHP, Elixir while Umami leverages Next.js.
Plausible has been in development longer, starting 8 years ago, compared to Umami which began 6 years ago. This 1.6-year head start suggests Plausible may have more mature features and established processes.
Umami uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Plausible's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics.
Both Plausible and Umami offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs