What is the main difference between Matomo and Umami?

Matomo and Umami are both web analytics but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Matomo or Umami?

The choice between Matomo and Umami depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Matomo to Umami?

Migration between Matomo and Umami is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Openlane – Open-source, developer-first platform for automated compliance, risk management, and built-in Trust Center.

Learn More

Learn more

Matomo vs Umami

Learn how Matomo and Umami differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.

Matomo

Comprehensive web analytics platform offering full data ownership, privacy protection, and customizable insights for data-driven decision making.

Visit Matomo Read more

Stars
21,629
Forks
2,862
Last commit
9 hours ago
Repository age
15 years
License
GPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes

Activity score

94/100

View Repository

Umami

A lightweight, open-source alternative to Google Analytics that respects user privacy and provides valuable insights.

Visit Umami Read more

Stars
37,298
Forks
7,362
Last commit
16 hours ago
Repository age
6 years
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes

Activity score

97/100

View Repository

Detailed Comparison

Both Matomo and Umami have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Umami wins

Community & Popularity

Umami leads in popularity with 37,298 stars vs 21,629 stars for Matomo. The 72% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Umami has 7,362 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Matomo last updated 9 hours ago and Umami 16 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Matomo uses Bash, Vue, PHP while Umami leverages JSX, Next.js.

Matomo wins

Project Maturity

Matomo has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to Umami which began 6 years ago. This 9.4-year head start suggests Matomo may have more mature features and established processes.

Umami wins

Licensing

Umami uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Matomo's GPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable