Matomo significantly outpaces Litlyx in community adoption with 21,741 stars compared to 1,742 stars on GitHub. This 12.5x difference suggests Matomo has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Matomo has 2,883 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Matomo shows more recent development activity with its last commit 3 hours ago, while Litlyx was last updated 8 months ago. This suggests Matomo is being more actively maintained.

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, Vue. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Litlyx uses SCSS, Nuxt.js while Matomo leverages Bash, PHP.

Matomo has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to Litlyx which began 2 years ago. This 13.4-year head start suggests Matomo may have more mature features and established processes.

The projects use different licenses: Litlyx is licensed under Apache-2.0 while Matomo uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.

Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics. However, they also have distinct specializations: Litlyx also focuses on Product Analytics.

Both Litlyx and Matomo offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.