Learn how Matomo and Plausible differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Matomo and Plausible have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Matomo having 21,800 stars and Plausible having 28,727 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Matomo has 2,893 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Plausible is growing faster, adding 726 stars in the last 30 days (+2.6%) against adding 83 stars for Matomo (+0.4%). Plausible is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Matomo last updated 5 hours ago and Plausible 4 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, PHP. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Matomo uses Vue while Plausible leverages JSX, Elixir.
Matomo has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to Plausible which began 8 years ago. This 7.8-year head start suggests Matomo may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Matomo is licensed under GPL-3.0 while Plausible uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics.
Both Matomo and Plausible offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs