Learn how Fathom Lite and Plausible differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Both Fathom Lite and Plausible have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Plausible significantly outpaces Fathom Lite in community adoption with 24,656 stars compared to 8,007 stars on GitHub. This 3.1x difference suggests Plausible has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Plausible has 1,388 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Plausible shows more recent development activity with its last commit 16 hours ago, while Fathom Lite was last updated 1 month ago. This suggests Plausible is being more actively maintained.
Fathom Lite has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to Plausible which began 7 years ago. This 2.1-year head start suggests Fathom Lite may have more mature features and established processes.
Fathom Lite uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Plausible's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics.
Plausible provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Fathom Lite may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs