Learn how Fathom Lite and Plausible differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
7 months agoRepository age
10 yearsVersion
v1.3.1License
MITRepository
usefathom/fathom
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
8 yearsVersion
v3.2.1License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
plausible/analytics
Plausible appears to have several advantages over Fathom Lite, particularly in popularity, growth, activity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Plausible significantly outpaces Fathom Lite in community adoption with 29,640 stars compared to 8,019 stars on GitHub. This 3.7x difference suggests Plausible has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Plausible has 1,917 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Plausible is growing faster, adding 435 stars in the last 30 days (+1.5%) against losing 1 stars for Fathom Lite (0%). Plausible is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Plausible shows more recent development activity with its last commit 1 day ago, while Fathom Lite was last updated 7 months ago. This suggests Plausible is being more actively maintained.
Fathom Lite has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Plausible which began 8 years ago. This 2.1-year head start suggests Fathom Lite may have more mature features and established processes.
Fathom Lite uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Plausible's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics.
Plausible provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Fathom Lite may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs