Learn how Fathom Lite and Vemetric differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
7 months agoRepository age
10 yearsVersion
v1.3.1License
MITRepository
usefathom/fathom
Last 30 days
Last commit
10 hours agoRepository age
1 yearLicense
AGPL-3.0Repository
vemetric/vemetric
Fathom Lite appears to have several advantages over Vemetric, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Fathom Lite significantly outpaces Vemetric in community adoption with 8,019 stars compared to 392 stars on GitHub. This 20.5x difference suggests Fathom Lite has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Fathom Lite has 386 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Fathom Lite and Vemetric are moving at much the same rate, losing 1 stars and losing 1 stars respectively over the last 30 days (0% vs -0.3%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Vemetric shows more recent development activity with its last commit 10 hours ago, while Fathom Lite was last updated 7 months ago. This suggests Vemetric is being more actively maintained.
Fathom Lite has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Vemetric which began 1 year ago. This 8.7-year head start suggests Fathom Lite may have more mature features and established processes.
Fathom Lite uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Vemetric's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics. However, they also have distinct specializations: Vemetric extends into Product Analytics.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs