Learn how Countly and Fathom Lite differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Countly appears to have several advantages over Fathom Lite, particularly in activity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Both tools have similar popularity levels, with Countly having 5,870 stars and Fathom Lite having 8,008 stars on GitHub. In terms of developer contributions, Countly has 982 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Countly shows more recent development activity with its last commit 13 hours ago, while Fathom Lite was last updated 3 months ago. This suggests Countly is being more actively maintained.
Countly has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Fathom Lite which began 10 years ago. This 4.5-year head start suggests Countly may have more mature features and established processes.
Fathom Lite is licensed under MIT, while Countly's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics. However, they also have distinct specializations: Countly also focuses on Product Analytics.
Countly provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Fathom Lite may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs