What is the main difference between Countly and Umami?

Countly and Umami are both web analytics but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Countly or Umami?

The choice between Countly and Umami depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Countly to Umami?

Migration between Countly and Umami is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

InfluxDB – The purpose-built time series platform for high-velocity ingestion and real-time queries at scale.

Learn More

Countly vs Umami

Learn how Countly and Umami differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.

Countly

All-in-one analytics platform for mobile, web, and desktop apps. Track user behavior, monitor performance, and optimize your product.

Visit Countly Read more

5,902stars+16(+0.3%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
3 days ago
Repository age
14 years
Version
25.03.53-LTS
License
other
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
countly/countly-server

Umami

A lightweight, open-source alternative to Google Analytics that respects user privacy and provides valuable insights.

Visit Umami Read more

38,785stars+594(+1.6%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
10 hours ago
Repository age
6 years
Version
v3.3.1
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
umami-software/umami

Detailed Comparison

Umami appears to have several advantages over Countly, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Umami wins

Community & Popularity

Umami significantly outpaces Countly in community adoption with 38,785 stars compared to 5,902 stars on GitHub. This 6.6x difference suggests Umami has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Umami has 8,017 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Umami wins

Growth Momentum

Umami is growing faster, adding 594 stars in the last 30 days (+1.6%) against adding 16 stars for Countly (+0.3%). Umami is both larger and pulling further ahead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Countly last updated 3 days ago and Umami 10 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Countly uses Bash while Umami leverages CSS, JSX, Next.js.

Countly wins

Project Maturity

Countly has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Umami which began 6 years ago. This 8.3-year head start suggests Countly may have more mature features and established processes.

Umami wins

Licensing

Umami uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Countly's other license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics. However, they also have distinct specializations: Countly also focuses on Product Analytics.

Comparable