Umami significantly outpaces Countly in community adoption with 38,047 stars compared to 5,886 stars on GitHub. This 6.5x difference suggests Umami has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Umami has 7,696 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Both projects show recent activity, with Countly last updated 7 hours ago and Umami 6 hours ago.

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Countly uses Bash while Umami leverages CSS, JSX, Next.js.

Countly has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Umami which began 6 years ago. This 8.3-year head start suggests Countly may have more mature features and established processes.

Umami is licensed under MIT, while Countly's license terms are not publicly specified.

Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics. However, they also have distinct specializations: Countly also focuses on Product Analytics.

Both Countly and Umami offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.