Learn how Countly and Rybbit differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
5 hours agoRepository age
14 yearsVersion
25.03.56-LTSLicense
OtherSelf-hosted
YesRepository
countly-server
Last 30 days
Last commit
7 hours agoRepository age
2 yearsVersion
v2.9.2License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
rybbit-io/rybbit
Both Countly and Rybbit have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Rybbit leads in popularity with 13,156 stars vs 5,921 stars for Countly. The 122% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Countly has 983 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Rybbit is growing faster, adding 93 stars in the last 30 days (+0.7%) against adding 14 stars for Countly (+0.2%). Rybbit is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Countly last updated 5 hours ago and Rybbit 7 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Rybbit leverages CSS, JSX, Next.js.
Countly has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Rybbit which began 2 years ago. This 12.8-year head start suggests Countly may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Countly is licensed under Other while Rybbit uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics, Product Analytics.
Both Countly and Rybbit offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs