Ad
Sevalla – Deploy your app before your coffee gets cold. It’s that easy. Try Sevalla with $50 free credit.Learn More
Sevalla – Deploy your app before your coffee gets cold. It’s that easy. Try Sevalla with $50 free credit.Sevalla – Deploy your app before your coffee gets cold. It’s that easy. Try Sevalla with $50 free credit.Learn how Countly and Rybbit differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Both Countly and Rybbit have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Rybbit leads in popularity with 12,563 stars vs 5,886 stars for Countly. The 113% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Countly has 981 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Countly last updated 7 hours ago and Rybbit 2 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Rybbit leverages CSS, JSX, Next.js.
Countly has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Rybbit which began 2 years ago. This 12.8-year head start suggests Countly may have more mature features and established processes.
Rybbit is licensed under AGPL-3.0, while Countly's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics, Product Analytics.
Countly provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Rybbit may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
Countlyvs
PostHogActivity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository
