Ad
Capture – Capture screenshots, generate PDFs, scrape content, extract metadata, and automate browsers with one API.Learn More
Capture – Capture screenshots, generate PDFs, scrape content, extract metadata, and automate browsers with one API.Capture – Capture screenshots, generate PDFs, scrape content, extract metadata, and automate browsers with one API.Learn how Countly and OpenWebAnalytics differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Both Countly and OpenWebAnalytics have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Countly leads in popularity with 5,886 stars vs 2,681 stars for OpenWebAnalytics. The 120% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Countly has 980 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Countly last updated 1 day ago and OpenWebAnalytics 16 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Countly uses Bash, Typescript while OpenWebAnalytics leverages CSS, PHP.
Both projects started around the same time, with Countly beginning 14 years ago and OpenWebAnalytics 14 years ago.
OpenWebAnalytics is licensed under GPL-2.0, while Countly's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics. However, they also have distinct specializations: Countly also focuses on Product Analytics.
Both Countly and OpenWebAnalytics offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
Countlyvs
PostHogActivity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
Self-hosted
Repository
Activity score
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository
