Learn how Countly and OpenWebAnalytics differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Both Countly and OpenWebAnalytics have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Countly leads in popularity with 5,850 stars vs 2,660 stars for OpenWebAnalytics. The 120% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Countly has 981 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Countly shows more recent development activity with its last commit 5 hours ago, while OpenWebAnalytics was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests Countly is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Countly uses Bash, Typescript while OpenWebAnalytics leverages CSS, PHP.
Both projects started around the same time, with Countly beginning 14 years ago and OpenWebAnalytics 14 years ago.
OpenWebAnalytics is licensed under GPL-2.0, while Countly's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics. However, they also have distinct specializations: Countly also focuses on Product Analytics.
Both Countly and OpenWebAnalytics offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs