Learn how OpenWebAnalytics and Umami differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Umami appears to have several advantages over OpenWebAnalytics, particularly in popularity, activity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Umami significantly outpaces OpenWebAnalytics in community adoption with 36,247 stars compared to 2,660 stars on GitHub. This 13.6x difference suggests Umami has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Umami has 6,949 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Umami shows more recent development activity with its last commit 12 hours ago, while OpenWebAnalytics was last updated 2 months ago. This suggests Umami is being more actively maintained.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: OpenWebAnalytics uses PHP while Umami leverages Typescript, JSX, Next.js.
OpenWebAnalytics has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Umami which began 6 years ago. This 8.4-year head start suggests OpenWebAnalytics may have more mature features and established processes.
Umami uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than OpenWebAnalytics's GPL-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics.
Both OpenWebAnalytics and Umami offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs