Learn how Matomo and OpenWebAnalytics differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
6 hours agoRepository age
16 yearsVersion
5.14.2License
GPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
matomo-org/matomo
Last 30 days
Last commit
6 hours agoRepository age
15 yearsVersion
1.14.7License
GPL-2.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
open-web-analytics
Matomo appears to have several advantages over OpenWebAnalytics, particularly in popularity, growth and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Matomo significantly outpaces OpenWebAnalytics in community adoption with 22,028 stars compared to 2,696 stars on GitHub. This 8.2x difference suggests Matomo has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Matomo has 2,933 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Matomo is growing faster, adding 74 stars in the last 30 days (+0.3%) against adding 1 stars for OpenWebAnalytics (0%). Matomo is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Matomo last updated 6 hours ago and OpenWebAnalytics 6 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, PHP. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Matomo uses Bash, Typescript, Vue.
Matomo has been in development longer, starting 16 years ago, compared to OpenWebAnalytics which began 15 years ago. This 1.0-year head start suggests Matomo may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Matomo is licensed under GPL-3.0 while OpenWebAnalytics uses GPL-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics.
Both Matomo and OpenWebAnalytics offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs