Learn how Matomo and OpenWebAnalytics differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Matomo appears to have several advantages over OpenWebAnalytics, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Matomo significantly outpaces OpenWebAnalytics in community adoption with 21,800 stars compared to 2,685 stars on GitHub. This 8.1x difference suggests Matomo has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Matomo has 2,893 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Matomo and OpenWebAnalytics are moving at much the same rate, adding 83 stars and adding 6 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.4% vs +0.2%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Matomo last updated 5 hours ago and OpenWebAnalytics 4 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, PHP. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Matomo uses Bash, Typescript, Vue.
Matomo has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to OpenWebAnalytics which began 14 years ago. This 1.0-year head start suggests Matomo may have more mature features and established processes.
The projects use different licenses: Matomo is licensed under GPL-3.0 while OpenWebAnalytics uses GPL-2.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics.
Both Matomo and OpenWebAnalytics offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs