Learn how Fathom Lite and Matomo differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Matomo appears to have several advantages over Fathom Lite, particularly in popularity, activity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Matomo leads in popularity with 21,438 stars vs 8,006 stars for Fathom Lite. The 168% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Matomo has 2,837 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Matomo shows more recent development activity with its last commit 4 hours ago, while Fathom Lite was last updated 1 month ago. This suggests Matomo is being more actively maintained.
Matomo has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to Fathom Lite which began 9 years ago. This 5.7-year head start suggests Matomo may have more mature features and established processes.
Fathom Lite uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Matomo's GPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics.
Matomo provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Fathom Lite may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs