Learn how Fathom Lite and Matomo differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Matomo appears to have several advantages over Fathom Lite, particularly in popularity, growth, activity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Matomo leads in popularity with 21,789 stars vs 8,012 stars for Fathom Lite. The 172% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Matomo has 2,889 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Matomo is growing faster, adding 83 stars in the last 30 days (+0.4%) against adding 4 stars for Fathom Lite (0%). Matomo is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Matomo shows more recent development activity with its last commit 8 hours ago, while Fathom Lite was last updated 5 months ago. This suggests Matomo is being more actively maintained.
Matomo has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to Fathom Lite which began 10 years ago. This 5.7-year head start suggests Matomo may have more mature features and established processes.
Fathom Lite uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Matomo's GPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics.
Matomo provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Fathom Lite may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs