Learn how Fathom Lite and OpenWebAnalytics differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Activity score

Activity score

Both Fathom Lite and OpenWebAnalytics have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Fathom Lite leads in popularity with 8,007 stars vs 2,670 stars for OpenWebAnalytics. The 200% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, OpenWebAnalytics has 485 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Fathom Lite last updated 3 months ago and OpenWebAnalytics 4 months ago.
OpenWebAnalytics has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Fathom Lite which began 10 years ago. This 4.7-year head start suggests OpenWebAnalytics may have more mature features and established processes.
Fathom Lite uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than OpenWebAnalytics's GPL-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics.
OpenWebAnalytics provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Fathom Lite may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs