Learn how Fathom Lite and OpenWebAnalytics differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
License
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Both Fathom Lite and OpenWebAnalytics have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Fathom Lite significantly outpaces OpenWebAnalytics in community adoption with 8,007 stars compared to 2,662 stars on GitHub. This 3.0x difference suggests Fathom Lite has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, OpenWebAnalytics has 484 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Fathom Lite last updated 1 month ago and OpenWebAnalytics 2 months ago.
OpenWebAnalytics has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Fathom Lite which began 9 years ago. This 4.7-year head start suggests OpenWebAnalytics may have more mature features and established processes.
Fathom Lite uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than OpenWebAnalytics's GPL-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics.
OpenWebAnalytics provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Fathom Lite may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs