Learn how Fathom Lite and OpenWebAnalytics differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Fathom Lite and OpenWebAnalytics have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Fathom Lite leads in popularity with 8,012 stars vs 2,684 stars for OpenWebAnalytics. The 199% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, OpenWebAnalytics has 489 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Fathom Lite and OpenWebAnalytics are moving at much the same rate, adding 4 stars and adding 5 stars respectively over the last 30 days (0% vs +0.2%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
OpenWebAnalytics shows more recent development activity with its last commit 6 hours ago, while Fathom Lite was last updated 5 months ago. This suggests OpenWebAnalytics is being more actively maintained.
OpenWebAnalytics has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Fathom Lite which began 10 years ago. This 4.7-year head start suggests OpenWebAnalytics may have more mature features and established processes.
Fathom Lite uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than OpenWebAnalytics's GPL-2.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics.
OpenWebAnalytics provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Fathom Lite may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs