What is the main difference between Fathom Lite and Umami?

Fathom Lite and Umami are both web analytics but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Fathom Lite or Umami?

The choice between Fathom Lite and Umami depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Fathom Lite to Umami?

Migration between Fathom Lite and Umami is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

CodeRabbit – The leading AI Code Review platform. Ship better quality code in 50% less time, with 90% fewer bugs.

Learn More

Learn more

Fathom Lite vs Umami

Learn how Fathom Lite and Umami differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.

Fathom Lite

A simple, privacy-first analytics platform that provides valuable website insights without compromising visitor data or requiring cookie consent banners.

Visit Fathom Lite Read more

Stars
8,007
Forks
380
Last commit
1 month ago
Repository age
9 years
License
MIT

View Repository

Auto-fetched 10 hours ago.

Umami

A lightweight, open-source alternative to Google Analytics that respects user privacy and provides valuable insights.

Visit Umami Read more

Stars
36,296
Forks
6,968
Last commit
1 day ago
Repository age
6 years
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes

View Repository

Auto-fetched 10 hours ago.

Detailed Comparison

Umami appears to have several advantages over Fathom Lite, particularly in popularity, activity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Umami wins

Community & Popularity

Umami significantly outpaces Fathom Lite in community adoption with 36,296 stars compared to 8,007 stars on GitHub. This 4.5x difference suggests Umami has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Umami has 6,968 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Umami wins

Development Activity

Umami shows more recent development activity with its last commit 1 day ago, while Fathom Lite was last updated 1 month ago. This suggests Umami is being more actively maintained.

Fathom Lite wins

Project Maturity

Fathom Lite has been in development longer, starting 9 years ago, compared to Umami which began 6 years ago. This 3.7-year head start suggests Fathom Lite may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics.

Umami wins

Hosting & Deployment

Umami provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Fathom Lite may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.