Umami significantly outpaces Fathom Lite in community adoption with 38,047 stars compared to 8,012 stars on GitHub. This 4.7x difference suggests Umami has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Umami has 7,696 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Umami shows more recent development activity with its last commit 6 hours ago, while Fathom Lite was last updated 5 months ago. This suggests Umami is being more actively maintained.

Fathom Lite has been in development longer, starting 10 years ago, compared to Umami which began 6 years ago. This 3.7-year head start suggests Fathom Lite may have more mature features and established processes.

Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.

Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics.

Umami provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Fathom Lite may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.