What is the main difference between HitKeep and Umami?

HitKeep and Umami are both web analytics but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: HitKeep or Umami?

The choice between HitKeep and Umami depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from HitKeep to Umami?

Migration between HitKeep and Umami is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Sent – A unified API for sending messages across SMS, RCS, and apps like WhatsApp.

Learn More

HitKeep vs Umami

Learn how HitKeep and Umami differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.

HitKeep

Self-hosted or managed web analytics with zero external dependencies. Cookie-free tracking, full data sovereignty, and single binary deployment for organizations that own their data.

Visit HitKeep Read more

83stars

Last 30 days

Last commit
2 days ago
Repository age
10 months
Version
v2.13.12
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
pascalebeier/hitkeep

Sponsor HitKeep ongithub.com

Umami

A lightweight, open-source alternative to Google Analytics that respects user privacy and provides valuable insights.

Visit Umami Read more

38,337stars+454(+1.2%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
4 days ago
Repository age
6 years
Version
v3.3.1
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
umami-software/umami

Detailed Comparison

Umami appears to have several advantages over HitKeep, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Umami wins

Community & Popularity

Umami significantly outpaces HitKeep in community adoption with 38,337 stars compared to 83 stars on GitHub. This 461.9x difference suggests Umami has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Umami has 7,836 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with HitKeep last updated 2 days ago and Umami 4 days ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: HitKeep uses Bash, SCSS, Golang while Umami leverages JSX, Next.js.

Umami wins

Project Maturity

Umami has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to HitKeep which began 10 months ago. This 5.4-year head start suggests Umami may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable