Umami significantly outpaces HitKeep in community adoption with 38,047 stars compared to 79 stars on GitHub. This 481.6x difference suggests Umami has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Umami has 7,696 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Both projects show recent activity, with HitKeep last updated 2 days ago and Umami 6 hours ago.

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: HitKeep uses Bash, SCSS, Golang while Umami leverages JSX, Next.js.

Umami has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to HitKeep which began 9 months ago. This 5.4-year head start suggests Umami may have more mature features and established processes.

Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.

Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics.

Both HitKeep and Umami offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.