Learn how HitKeep and Umami differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Umami appears to have several advantages over HitKeep, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Umami significantly outpaces HitKeep in community adoption with 36,296 stars compared to 42 stars on GitHub. This 864.2x difference suggests Umami has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Umami has 6,968 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with HitKeep last updated 19 hours ago and Umami 1 day ago.
Umami has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to HitKeep which began 6 months ago. This 5.4-year head start suggests Umami may have more mature features and established processes.
Both projects use the MIT license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics.
Both HitKeep and Umami offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs