Learn how Swetrix and Umami differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
8 days agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
v5.5.3License
AGPL-3.0Self-hosted
YesRepository
swetrix/swetrix-api
Last 30 days
Last commit
1 day agoRepository age
6 yearsVersion
v3.5.0License
MITSelf-hosted
YesRepository
umami-software/umami
Umami appears to have several advantages over Swetrix, particularly in popularity, growth and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Umami significantly outpaces Swetrix in community adoption with 40,120 stars compared to 1,222 stars on GitHub. This 32.8x difference suggests Umami has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Umami has 8,542 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Umami is growing faster, adding 744 stars in the last 30 days (+1.9%) against adding 16 stars for Swetrix (+1.3%). Umami is both larger and pulling further ahead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Swetrix last updated 8 days ago and Umami 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Swetrix uses Bash, NestJS while Umami leverages Next.js.
Both projects started around the same time, with Swetrix beginning 6 years ago and Umami 6 years ago.
Umami uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Swetrix's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics.
Both Swetrix and Umami offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs