Learn how Swetrix and Umami differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Swetrix and Umami have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Umami significantly outpaces Swetrix in community adoption with 38,337 stars compared to 1,170 stars on GitHub. This 32.8x difference suggests Umami has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Umami has 7,836 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Swetrix is growing faster, adding 68 stars in the last 30 days (+6.2%) against adding 454 stars for Umami (+1.2%). Swetrix is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.
Both projects show recent activity, with Swetrix last updated 3 days ago and Umami 4 days ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Swetrix uses Bash, NestJS while Umami leverages Next.js.
Both projects started around the same time, with Swetrix beginning 5 years ago and Umami 6 years ago.
Umami uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Swetrix's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics.
Both Swetrix and Umami offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs