Rybbit vs Umami

Umami significantly outpaces Rybbit in community adoption with 38,260 stars compared to 12,752 stars on GitHub. This 3.0x difference suggests Umami has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Umami has 7,798 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Rybbit is growing faster, adding 263 stars in the last 30 days (+2.1%) against adding 491 stars for Umami (+1.3%). Rybbit is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Both projects show recent activity, with Rybbit last updated 16 hours ago and Umami 1 day ago.

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Rybbit uses Bash.

Umami has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Rybbit which began 2 years ago. This 4.6-year head start suggests Umami may have more mature features and established processes.

Umami uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Rybbit's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics. However, they also have distinct specializations: Rybbit also focuses on Product Analytics.

Umami provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Rybbit may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.