What is the main difference between Rybbit and Umami?

Rybbit and Umami are both web analytics but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Rybbit or Umami?

The choice between Rybbit and Umami depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Rybbit to Umami?

Migration between Rybbit and Umami is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Logto – Modern auth infrastructure for developers.

Learn More

Learn more

Rybbit vs Umami

Learn how Rybbit and Umami differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.

Rybbit

Get next-gen, open-source, and cookieless web analytics. Understand user behavior with session replays, real-time data, and web vitals. GDPR/CCPA compliant.

Visit Rybbit Read more

Stars
12,311
Forks
673
Last commit
11 hours ago
Repository age
1 year
License
AGPL-3.0

Activity score

92/100

View Repository

Umami

A lightweight, open-source alternative to Google Analytics that respects user privacy and provides valuable insights.

Visit Umami Read more

Stars
37,233
Forks
7,336
Last commit
12 hours ago
Repository age
6 years
License
MIT
Self-hosted
Yes

Activity score

97/100

View Repository

Detailed Comparison

Umami appears to have several advantages over Rybbit, particularly in popularity, maturity, licensing and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Umami wins

Community & Popularity

Umami significantly outpaces Rybbit in community adoption with 37,233 stars compared to 12,311 stars on GitHub. This 3.0x difference suggests Umami has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Umami has 7,336 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Rybbit last updated 11 hours ago and Umami 12 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Typescript, JSX, Next.js. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Rybbit uses Bash.

Umami wins

Project Maturity

Umami has been in development longer, starting 6 years ago, compared to Rybbit which began 1 year ago. This 4.6-year head start suggests Umami may have more mature features and established processes.

Umami wins

Licensing

Umami uses the MIT license, which is more permissive than Rybbit's AGPL-3.0 license, potentially offering greater flexibility for commercial use and integration.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics. However, they also have distinct specializations: Rybbit also focuses on Product Analytics.

Umami wins

Hosting & Deployment

Umami provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Rybbit may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.