Learn how Databuddy and Rybbit differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Last 30 days
Last commit
Repository age
Version
License
Self-hosted
Repository

Both Databuddy and Rybbit have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Rybbit significantly outpaces Databuddy in community adoption with 12,980 stars compared to 1,152 stars on GitHub. This 11.3x difference suggests Rybbit has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Rybbit has 742 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.
Databuddy and Rybbit are moving at much the same rate, adding 33 stars and adding 365 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+2.9% vs +2.9%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.
Both projects show recent activity, with Databuddy last updated 11 hours ago and Rybbit 1 day ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript, JSX, Next.js. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Databuddy uses Rust.
Both projects started around the same time, with Databuddy beginning 2 years ago and Rybbit 2 years ago.
Both projects use the AGPL-3.0 license, providing identical terms for usage and distribution.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics, Product Analytics.
Both Databuddy and Rybbit offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs