What is the main difference between Matomo and Rybbit?

Matomo and Rybbit are both web analytics but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Matomo or Rybbit?

The choice between Matomo and Rybbit depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Matomo to Rybbit?

Migration between Matomo and Rybbit is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

Efficient App – Not all Open Source alternatives are equal — Narrow down the best, without the bullsh*t.

Learn More

Learn more

Matomo vs Rybbit

Learn how Matomo and Rybbit differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.

Matomo

Comprehensive web analytics platform offering full data ownership, privacy protection, and customizable insights for data-driven decision making.

Visit Matomo Read more

Stars
21,451
Forks
2,837
Last commit
12 hours ago
Repository age
15 years
License
GPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes

View Repository

Auto-fetched 10 hours ago.

Rybbit

Get next-gen, open-source, and cookieless web analytics. Understand user behavior with session replays, real-time data, and web vitals. GDPR/CCPA compliant.

Visit Rybbit Read more

Stars
12,005
Forks
641
Last commit
2 days ago
Repository age
1 year
License
AGPL-3.0

View Repository

Auto-fetched 10 hours ago.

Detailed Comparison

Matomo appears to have several advantages over Rybbit, particularly in popularity, maturity and features. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Matomo wins

Community & Popularity

Matomo leads in popularity with 21,451 stars vs 12,005 stars for Rybbit. The 79% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Matomo has 2,837 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Matomo last updated 12 hours ago and Rybbit 2 days ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Matomo uses PHP, Vue while Rybbit leverages JSX, Next.js.

Matomo wins

Project Maturity

Matomo has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to Rybbit which began 1 year ago. This 14.0-year head start suggests Matomo may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

The projects use different licenses: Matomo is licensed under GPL-3.0 while Rybbit uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics. However, they also have distinct specializations: Rybbit extends into Product Analytics.

Matomo wins

Hosting & Deployment

Matomo provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Rybbit may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.