What is the main difference between Matomo and Rybbit?

Matomo and Rybbit are both web analytics but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Matomo or Rybbit?

The choice between Matomo and Rybbit depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Matomo to Rybbit?

Migration between Matomo and Rybbit is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

c15t – Open-source cookie banner, built for control and lightening fast modern web apps.

Learn more

Matomo vs Rybbit

Learn how Matomo and Rybbit differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.

Matomo

Comprehensive web analytics platform offering full data ownership, privacy protection, and customizable insights for data-driven decision making.

Visit Matomo Read more

21,979stars+84(+0.4%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
13 hours ago
Repository age
16 years
Version
5.14.2
License
GPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
matomo-org/matomo

Rybbit

Get next-gen, open-source, and cookieless web analytics. Understand user behavior with session replays, real-time data, and web vitals. GDPR/CCPA compliant.

Visit Rybbit Read more

13,156stars+93(+0.7%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
7 hours ago
Repository age
2 years
Version
v2.9.2
License
AGPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
rybbit-io/rybbit

Detailed Comparison

Both Matomo and Rybbit have their unique strengths and serve similar purposes effectively. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Matomo wins

Community & Popularity

Matomo leads in popularity with 21,979 stars vs 13,156 stars for Rybbit. The 67% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Matomo has 2,921 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Rybbit wins

Growth Momentum

Rybbit is growing faster, adding 93 stars in the last 30 days (+0.7%) against adding 84 stars for Matomo (+0.4%). Rybbit is the smaller project of the two, so it is closing the gap rather than extending a lead.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Matomo last updated 13 hours ago and Rybbit 7 hours ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Matomo uses PHP, Vue while Rybbit leverages JSX, Next.js.

Matomo wins

Project Maturity

Matomo has been in development longer, starting 16 years ago, compared to Rybbit which began 2 years ago. This 14.0-year head start suggests Matomo may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

The projects use different licenses: Matomo is licensed under GPL-3.0 while Rybbit uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics. However, they also have distinct specializations: Rybbit extends into Product Analytics.

Comparable