Matomo leads in popularity with 21,741 stars vs 12,563 stars for Rybbit. The 73% higher star count indicates stronger community adoption. In terms of developer contributions, Matomo has 2,883 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Both projects show recent activity, with Matomo last updated 3 hours ago and Rybbit 2 days ago.

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Matomo uses Vue, PHP while Rybbit leverages JSX, Next.js.

Matomo has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to Rybbit which began 2 years ago. This 14.0-year head start suggests Matomo may have more mature features and established processes.

The projects use different licenses: Matomo is licensed under GPL-3.0 while Rybbit uses AGPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.

Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics. However, they also have distinct specializations: Rybbit extends into Product Analytics.

Matomo provides self-hosting options for complete data control and customization, while Rybbit may be primarily cloud-based or require different deployment approaches.