Learn how Countly and Matomo differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.
Stars
Forks
Last commit
Repository age
Self-hosted
Auto-fetched .

Auto-fetched .

Matomo appears to have several advantages over Countly, particularly in popularity, maturity and licensing. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.
Matomo significantly outpaces Countly in community adoption with 21,451 stars compared to 5,850 stars on GitHub. This 3.7x difference suggests Matomo has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Matomo has 2,837 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.
Both projects show recent activity, with Countly last updated 1 day ago and Matomo 12 hours ago.
Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Matomo leverages CSS, PHP, Vue.
Matomo has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to Countly which began 14 years ago. This 1.2-year head start suggests Matomo may have more mature features and established processes.
Matomo is licensed under GPL-3.0, while Countly's license terms are not publicly specified.
Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics. However, they also have distinct specializations: Countly also focuses on Product Analytics.
Both Countly and Matomo offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs
vs