What is the main difference between Countly and Matomo?

Countly and Matomo are both web analytics but differ in their approach, features, and target audience. Compare their GitHub stats, technology stack, and community adoption to make the best choice.

Which is better: Countly or Matomo?

The choice between Countly and Matomo depends on your specific needs, technical requirements, and team preferences. Both are quality open source solutions with active communities.

Can I migrate from Countly to Matomo?

Migration between Countly and Matomo is possible but requires careful planning. Consider data export/import capabilities, feature parity, and potential workflow changes.

InfluxDB – The purpose-built time series platform for high-velocity ingestion and real-time queries at scale.

Learn More

Countly vs Matomo

Learn how Countly and Matomo differ in their key features, development activity, technology stack and community adoption, so you can decide which of these web analytics is best for you.

Countly

All-in-one analytics platform for mobile, web, and desktop apps. Track user behavior, monitor performance, and optimize your product.

Visit Countly Read more

5,902stars+16(+0.3%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
3 days ago
Repository age
14 years
Version
25.03.53-LTS
License
other
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
countly/countly-server

Matomo

Comprehensive web analytics platform offering full data ownership, privacy protection, and customizable insights for data-driven decision making.

Visit Matomo Read more

21,863stars+96(+0.4%)

Last 30 days

Last commit
1 day ago
Repository age
15 years
Version
5.13.0
License
GPL-3.0
Self-hosted
Yes
Repository
matomo-org/matomo

Sponsor Matomo onopencollective.com

Detailed Comparison

Matomo appears to have several advantages over Countly, particularly in popularity and maturity. Consider your specific needs regarding popularity, growth, activity, technology, maturity, licensing and features when making your decision.

Matomo wins

Community & Popularity

Matomo significantly outpaces Countly in community adoption with 21,863 stars compared to 5,902 stars on GitHub. This 3.7x difference suggests Matomo has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Matomo has 2,897 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

Comparable

Growth Momentum

Countly and Matomo are moving at much the same rate, adding 16 stars and adding 96 stars respectively over the last 30 days (+0.3% vs +0.4%). Neither is pulling away from the other on momentum alone.

Comparable

Development Activity

Both projects show recent activity, with Countly last updated 3 days ago and Matomo 1 day ago.

Comparable

Technology Stack

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Matomo leverages CSS, Vue, PHP.

Matomo wins

Project Maturity

Matomo has been in development longer, starting 15 years ago, compared to Countly which began 14 years ago. This 1.2-year head start suggests Matomo may have more mature features and established processes.

Comparable

Licensing

The projects use different licenses: Countly is licensed under other while Matomo uses GPL-3.0. Consider the licensing requirements when choosing for your project.

Comparable

Use Cases & Features

Both tools serve similar use cases in Web Analytics. However, they also have distinct specializations: Countly also focuses on Product Analytics.

Comparable