Countly significantly outpaces Trench in community adoption with 5,886 stars compared to 1,648 stars on GitHub. This 3.6x difference suggests Countly has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, Countly has 980 forks, indicating moderate developer engagement.

Countly shows more recent development activity with its last commit 5 hours ago, while Trench was last updated 4 months ago. This suggests Countly is being more actively maintained.

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: Trench leverages CSS, NestJS.

Countly has been in development longer, starting 14 years ago, compared to Trench which began 2 years ago. This 12.5-year head start suggests Countly may have more mature features and established processes.

Trench is licensed under MIT, while Countly's license terms are not publicly specified.

Both tools serve similar use cases in Product Analytics. However, they also have distinct specializations: Countly also focuses on Web Analytics while Trench extends into Event Streaming Platforms, Stream Processing.

Both Countly and Trench offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.