PostHog significantly outpaces Trench in community adoption with 37,485 stars compared to 1,649 stars on GitHub. This 22.7x difference suggests PostHog has a much larger and more active community. In terms of developer contributions, PostHog has 3,137 forks, indicating strong developer engagement.

PostHog shows more recent development activity with its last commit 4 hours ago, while Trench was last updated 4 months ago. This suggests PostHog is being more actively maintained.

Both tools share common technology foundations, being built with JavaScript, CSS, Bash, Typescript. However, they differ in their additional technology choices: PostHog uses JSX, Python, SCSS, Golang, Rust, C, Objective-C, C++ while Trench leverages NestJS.

PostHog has been in development longer, starting 7 years ago, compared to Trench which began 2 years ago. This 4.8-year head start suggests PostHog may have more mature features and established processes.

Trench is licensed under MIT, while PostHog's license terms are not publicly specified.

Both tools serve similar use cases in Product Analytics. However, they also have distinct specializations: Trench extends into Event Streaming Platforms, Stream Processing.

Both PostHog and Trench offer self-hosting capabilities, giving you full control over your data and infrastructure.